Boshek said:
The issue in this case is whether a breach of contract has occurred when a Football TV Sponsor has not paid $430,000 for a friendly home game. The Plaintiff seeks $430,000 that was not paid from the sponsor, and unspecified damages for sleepless nights and mental anguish.

This court shall first address the claim of breach of contract. In support of her claim that there was a breach of contract, the Plaintiff, Thayk Ferols, cites the Contract between their football team and the Defendant, the TV Sponsor. The language in question is "$430,000" for every home game.

Although this language favors the Plaintiff's position, further research reveals evidence harmful to the Plaintiff's case. The most damaging source can be found at http://uk.strikermanager.com/wiki/index.php?title=AMISTOSOS. This document specifically addresses friendlies, and states that "there is no television or sponsor income from these games - just ticket sales." In resolving conflicting language in a standardized contract, it is often helpful to look to how the contract language has been applied historically. The research reveals that every single Friendly match has not received pay from the home team's Sponsor, yet this court can find no other challenges presented prior to this one.

Having reviewed the arguments discussed above, this court finds that there was not a breach of contract. The fine print located in additional documents that specifically address friendly games specifically states that Sponsors do not pay for mere friendly matches. In addition, Sponsors have never before paid for friendly matches.

Complaint Dismissed

Boshek said:
The issue in this case is whether a breach of contract has occurred when a Football TV Sponsor has not paid $430,000 for a friendly home game. The Plaintiff seeks $430,000 that was not paid from the sponsor, and unspecified damages for sleepless nights and mental anguish.

This court shall first address the claim of breach of contract. In support of her claim that there was a breach of contract, the Plaintiff, Thayk Ferols, cites the Contract between their football team and the Defendant, the TV Sponsor. The language in question is "$430,000" for every home game.

Although this language favors the Plaintiff's position, further research reveals evidence harmful to the Plaintiff's case. The most damaging source can be found at http://uk.strikermanager.com/wiki/index.php?title=AMISTOSOS. This document specifically addresses friendlies, and states that "there is no television or sponsor income from these games - just ticket sales." In resolving conflicting language in a standardized contract, it is often helpful to look to how the contract language has been applied historically. The research reveals that every single Friendly match has not received pay from the home team's Sponsor, yet this court can find no other challenges presented prior to this one.

Having reviewed the arguments discussed above, this court finds that there was not a breach of contract. The fine print located in additional documents that specifically address friendly games specifically states that Sponsors do not pay for mere friendly matches. In addition, Sponsors have never before paid for friendly matches.

Complaint Dismissed