Forum » Doubts and questions » Market anomaly? | Date | |
---|---|---|
921 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
In the past 24hours I've noticed some players from no team on the market, with starting bids at their release clause price. Yet when looking at their history they used to belong to a team ("Rangers" in this case) but show no sign of being fired or any other action to cause them to have no team, can anyone explain this? | 02/06/2011 20:11 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Yeah, saw that. I can only presume the team Rangers has been retained but has been taken by a new user today with new players, the previous players may have been placed on auction by the system but why at their ridiculous release clause who knows. However, I checked news--->sanctions and no sign of a Rangers team!! The new manager from india started today, but players were put on auction yesterday.... possibly by the booted user??? Edited by GunnerNic 02-06-2011 21:22 |
02/06/2011 21:21 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
677 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I've seen a couple of good players with no team, but to my surprise they are over priced. There's no way am spending 33 million for a player with 53 average. | 02/06/2011 22:17 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
4257 msgs.
Best scorer
|
ya their also some strange bid in the market .. a 28 LM age 18 for 1 million bid and a 44 LW age 30 for 3,6 mill ..with both manager got their team retained and joined the game and left after 1 min .... | 03/06/2011 12:20 |
- Div/Gr | ||