Go to page 1
  Forum » Doubts and questions » Reducing averages Date
Username
23 msgs.
Child's coach
To admin,

what is going on. you said you have reduced the players who we bought for free. i paid my goalkeeper $2,000,000 and he went from 49 to 38. what the hell are you guys doing?. and how is that inequality. i bought him fair and square. why do you guys always make these changes. answer my question please.
20/06/2011 17:19
  - Div/Gr
Username
2440 msgs.
Best scorer
Hi im not a @ but i think what happend to you is that your players got low on stamina, moral or fitness that happens every season. The admin cant just decide to reduce your players average if you bought him faire and square. If they did i agree with you thats totally unfair.

Edited by Crack1993 20-06-2011 18:31

Edited by Crack1993 20-06-2011 18:32
20/06/2011 18:26
  - Div/Gr
Username
23 msgs.
Child's coach
it is not some decrease in stamin, fitness or morale. the training is decreased by about -7.8 or something. i am in 4th division. i need every good player i can use. this is just not cool what they are doing randomly. 20/06/2011 18:49
  - Div/Gr
Username
23 msgs.
Child's coach
same thing happened to me and u know whats bothering me? I've increased the players salary but tht doesnt go down like the averages... come onnn... I bought them... I dont care if it was a bug or somethin what I care abt is the money I'm gonna lose and of course the games i'm gonna lose just because the admins felt like decreasing the averages because of their OWN FAILUREEEE... when u think abt it it was really not my fault tht the game had a bug... I'm suffering frm admins failures... If u want the game to improve u should cut down on those BUGS and stop taking it on the users... do admins see this?

Edited by The Imperfectionist 20-06-2011 19:41
20/06/2011 19:31
  - Div/Gr
Username
4257 msgs.
Best scorer
what happens i think is : u bought that player from a team that already bought him for free because what so called a bug...
so when admin decided to reduce every player that was bought free.. ur player average decreased.. bad luck ..
20/06/2011 20:44
  - Div/Gr
Username
23 msgs.
Child's coach
you are probably right on that. but its not fair for some who paid 2 million for the player.
20/06/2011 21:19
  - Div/Gr
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
2mill for a 38 GK is a fair price 20/06/2011 22:54
  - Div/Gr
Username
23 msgs.
Child's coach

WHAT!! r u serious!! , i dont know what kind of use you have for a 38 GK(age 26), but i would NEVER buy someone like that from senior market

i already have good 46 GK. i bought him because it was a steal. 49 GK for 2 mill. i would buy him anyday. that is exactly what i am pissed off about. getting someone like that, only to be taken away from u. NOT COOL STRICKER MANAGER.
20/06/2011 23:14
  - Div/Gr
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
You said it, a 49 GK is a steal at 2 mill, so what would be a fair price for a 49 GK?
you see where I'm going, now do the math and work back to a 38.

A 26 yr old GK has better experience (your value is 10 which is high), which makes a diff in games.

Besides your GK is not a 38 but a 42 actually, so you did quite well I think

Cheers
Nic
21/06/2011 08:55
  - Div/Gr
Username
23 msgs.
Child's coach
i see your point too. but for 36 gk and age 26 i would probably pay around 200k-500k. i still think the gk can come back to 49 if i can somehow find some workout in training that can bump his training up to +0. 21/06/2011 16:16
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1
1