Go to page 1
| Forum » Doubts and questions » Maximum AV | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
425 msgs.
First-team player
|
How often does a player need to be trained per week in order to reach his maximum potential? If I have a MDF that seems to train really well, and I train every day on Organize Midfielders, will i see his training % start to taper off when he gets close to his maximum, and then start to taper off, or will it shoot up to the maximum, and then hit a plateau until he hits his decline when he gets old? Will training him a lot flatten out his Av Parabola, or will the arc stay approximately the same, but be artificially flattened by his maximum (like if you take the St. Louis arch and cut it off halfway up)? I've read a little bit about "doping" youth players to make them look really good. If their arc shoots up and then plateaus under heavy training, it would be much harder to detect than if a player can only train so well before hitting the max, but having a much more gradual curve that begins to slowly decline and having an apex at his maximum forecast value. It is this kind of calculation that i am attempting to work out... |
16/07/2011 02:04 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
471 msgs.
First-team player
|
You either quit training defense or get younger CDFs,at this rate your old CDFs will be out of steam in a matter of days. | 16/07/2011 07:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3188 msgs.
Best scorer
|
They will train normally but when they arrive to 10(+/-) less than his forecast, they improve lowly. |
16/07/2011 11:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1241 msgs.
International
|
. | 16/07/2011 14:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3188 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Expositoto said: . I agree this hahaha  |
16/07/2011 14:17 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
425 msgs.
First-team player
|
Nasregas said: You either quit training defense or get younger CDFs,at this rate your old CDFs will be out of steam in a matter of days. I'm not actually asking in reference to any specific players on my current or future roster. I'm trying to figure out the approximate math behind the numbers. If I read between the lines of what you're saying though, it sounds like there is a stamina portion to consider when training that i have not yet run across anywhere on the forums. While this does not actually address my original question, it does add an additional factor that needs to be accounted for when training. |
16/07/2011 18:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
471 msgs.
First-team player
|
Not stamina,but age. And their is a good answer^^^ |
16/07/2011 19:12 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
425 msgs.
First-team player
|
I understand that a player begins to decline with age. What i'm trying to understand is whether or not a player will hit his max, stay there for a few years, and then start to slide down, or will he gradually reach it, and then once hit, begin to slowly slide down. What i've determined from this thread so far is that a player can be 'over trained' by training in the same thing too much, and the symptom of that will be his stamina going down. Has anyone done any quantitative tracking to tell by how much stamina will drop per training session relative to the training % that player gets from the training type? |
16/07/2011 20:31 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1772 msgs.
International
|
you can pay 10 golden balls to see the progressive curve. I had a player who stopped improving at the age of 18, he would've stayed same level until 27 then fall steeply. | 16/07/2011 23:52 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
425 msgs.
First-team player
|
superkrapper said: you can pay 10 golden balls to see the progressive curve. I had a player who stopped improving at the age of 18, he would've stayed same level until 27 then fall steeply. Now THAT is exactly what i was looking for. Thank you very much superkrapper. |
17/07/2011 19:22 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
