Go to page 1
  Forum » Doubts and questions » School and Prospect quality statistics Date
425 msgs.
First-team player
 Has anyone been keeping track of the players they have gotten from their schools, including their progressions and what level the school was at when the players were promoted?

I have started a spreadsheet, but so far only have 2 data points. I'm wondering if there is any real measurable difference in the player quality coming out of the various schools.

With this kind of empirical data, I (much like many others here, i'd imagine) would think we could figure out if it's really worth putting the extra money into a place like Brazil vs China (Top 2 spawn rates, very different qualities).

There has to be a reason the players would have to make that choice beyond mere nationalism, and it should be a choice the player actually has to think about and consider before choosing, rather than being one clearly superior to the other.

For example, does a Low Brazil school spawn a measurably higher quality of player on average over a span of a season than China, but cost nearly 4 times as much to build, giving the the tradeoff choice for the player to make. Or, do they both spawn relatively similar quality players and thus not being worth the extra cost in Brazil?

I'd love to compare notes with anyone that has done any kind of analysis like this. I've already got my theories based on my own small data set, but i'd love to see what others have found through actual data, not rumor and hearsay. 		29/07/2011 06:49
  - Div/Gr
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
There's another thread buried a few pages back on this or suggestions...you can get something from that one. 		29/07/2011 07:53
  - Div/Gr
Username
223 msgs.
Substitute
 In the beginning, what you pay for a quality school is equitable to the players that you get. If you continuing making the statistics and you still see that what I've just told you isn't correct, please, let us know and we'll look into it. 29/07/2011 14:36
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1
1