Forum » Doubts and questions » School Players Suck Now! | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
231 msgs.
Substitute
|
I have several schools and i promoted three school players since version 3 has begun and they all suck...in version 2 they had bad ratings but when they got promoted to my junior squad they got a boost....now they stay the same 11 , 7 , 16 avg. i went ahead to check out their forecast and it is all grim...not higher than a 17 avg....Some them have low progression as in less than 30% but one of them had around the 60% range i believe as well. I understand that is not high but I would expect a player to be able to grow a bit...Is this what can be expected from the schools now? Should I not promote school players yet? Am I doing something wrong? Will it take time for the forecast to change as long i train them? Any and all help is welcome. I have a Regular China School (2 players promoted) I have a Regular Crotia School (1 player promoted) I have an Excellent New Zealand School (0 players promoted) I know these are not the best schools in the world...but i was getting decent players before the change from version 2 to version 3.... does changing the school to public make it any better? What does that option allow? Edited by shivmister 18-09-2011 16:21 Edited by shivmister 18-09-2011 16:24 |
18/09/2011 16:18 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
36 msgs.
Child's coach
|
Patience, I tell you from experience (in the Spanish striker has happened to me) early juveniles are not profitable, but over time will give you good players | 18/09/2011 16:26 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
133 msgs.
Substitute
|
el_Mentalista said: Patience, I tell you from experience (in the Spanish striker has happened to me) early juveniles are not profitable, but over time will give you good players No, he's saying it's changed from before. I've had the same problem. With the new simulator the junior players stay at a low average and all have bad forcasts. |
18/09/2011 17:41 |
- Div/Gr | ||
142 msgs.
Substitute
|
Forecast changes after training starts, right now all players probably have no forecast because there is no training going on. | 18/09/2011 17:47 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
530 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
We are not talking about forecast! We are talking about the starting average in the 10s! | 18/09/2011 17:57 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1835 msgs.
International
|
I PM'd an @. Check my public Sweden and Austria schools. Defining the players as crappy is being generous. I think it's a bug... |
18/09/2011 18:34 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
530 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
ABC DEFG said: I PM'd an @. Check my public Sweden and Austria schools. Defining the players as crappy is being generous. I think it's a bug... It is. |
18/09/2011 18:36 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
3188 msgs.
Best scorer
|
sgand said: ABC DEFG said: I PM'd an @. Check my public Sweden and Austria schools. Defining the players as crappy is being generous. I think it's a bug... It is. Yes? Why do you know that's a bug? Edited by @Bisho 18-09-2011 19:00 |
18/09/2011 19:00 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
29 msgs.
Child's coach
|
Well it had better be a bug, otherwise we've all wasted a lot of money on schools that used to provide good players and now provide garbage! | 18/09/2011 19:19 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
715 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I promoted a player yesterday from my High Quality school. Came out to a 16 average with a $52400 contract. LOL. Then again, the school is Korea (2.5 stars... for one of the best soccer countries in Asia). To whoever has the power: Retool the schools tool! |
18/09/2011 20:50 |
- Div/Gr | ||