| Forum » Doubts and questions » School Players Suck Now! | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
9 msgs.
Cadet
|
As someone new to the game (about 1/2 a season) I have not had a lot of production from my schools. But I have kept a spreadsheet of every player produced. Prior to the upgrade, every player's points increased by 55% to 64% when promoted to Jr. Every player now stays the same when promoted. It may not be a bug but if it is, you can bet that I will be shutting down my schools until I have enough $$$ to spend on level 5 schools. | 19/09/2011 23:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1835 msgs.
International
|
Exactly. My Switzerland school just produced a 14 avg player. I also keep track and prior to the upgrade, the lowest Switerland player was a 24 avg player (and that was Normal, not High as it is now). Mods, if the schools will now suck, please advise. Or, if this is a bug, please advise. Either way, say something. Nobody is asking for a 50/15 99% progression player from a * low school. Our requests are reasonable and should be acknowledged. There are multiple people that are waiting to hear whether to close the schools or keep them open. It makes no sense to have schools when a good scout can do the job. I find it interesting that if schools now do suck, that the developers wasted much time adding all sorts of South American schools.... |
19/09/2011 23:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
530 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Finally got a school player in the 20s | 19/09/2011 23:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
383 msgs.
First-team player
|
Am having same problem but i think we should stop promoting them this this new version is working fine | 20/09/2011 03:36 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
9 msgs.
Cadet
|
I agree. Lucky for me my schools are all slow producers so I won't even be getting any new players for at least a week. | 20/09/2011 03:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I always have faith in Uruguay and Netherland schools , no matter what happen | 20/09/2011 03:47 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2960 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@Bisho said: sgand said: ABC DEFG said: I PM'd an @. Check my public Sweden and Austria schools. Defining the players as crappy is being generous. I think it's a bug... It is. Yes? Why do you know that's a bug? Edited by @Bisho 18-09-2011 19:00 u know that isnt a bug??? we all have last season 30+ avg players with low schools so,is it a bug????? Edited by brezzette 20-09-2011 05:17 |
20/09/2011 04:42 |
| Mr. Q17 - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
2737 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I add my voice too, me excellent netherlands produced a shitty player... | 20/09/2011 06:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
116 msgs.
Substitute
|
Ok here is my observation regarding schools and it is absolutely horrendous if I'm honest. Absolutely horrendous. Before the update I promoted 19 players from my regular-high schools (all are 4 or 5 stars). The result? All the players were in the 25-40 average range. Sometimes better, sometimes worse and that seems reasonable to me. Now? I've promoted 7 players (I had no room to promote them last year, so I had to wait and leave them in the schools) and they are in the 7 (yes SEVEN) to 19 average range. For me the writing's on the wall - not one player under 25 with the first 19 promotions and then 7 in a row. For me that is big enough statistical population to clearly see that something fishy is going on here. Did someone send the message with this problem to the admin and did you get the answer what are they doing the fix this problem, because if nothing is done to fix this the schools will become useless. |
20/09/2011 07:55 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
142 msgs.
Substitute
|
Who have school in last season are so lucky,, | 20/09/2011 08:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
3
