| Forum » Doubts and questions » School Players Suck Now! | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
3188 msgs.
Best scorer
|
brezzette said: as i read somewhere if max training is 0.15 how can u up junior from 10avg to 80 ? we will need a lot of time where did you read that? Yeah, i see that you understood why admins did this  Edited by @Bisho 20-09-2011 21:56 |
20/09/2011 21:55 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Another question on this topic. If schools produse a bunch of special needs players (what the F am I suppose to do with a 6 average player), do new teams get juniors like that as well? I didn't spend $50M+ on excellent quality schools last season to get a bunch of retarted players in my junior squad. I feel like someone who sold his house in Sochi, Russia a day before they announced that they will host the olympic games (real estate value went up 10x times), because I sold my 25-35 av. juniors to make room for new juniors this season. | 20/09/2011 22:41 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2960 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@Bisho said: brezzette said: as i read somewhere if max training is 0.15 how can u up junior from 10avg to 80 ? we will need a lot of time where did you read that? Yeah, i see that you understood why admins did this Edited by @Bisho 20-09-2011 21:56 i read that from some1 who was testing beta version,ok now? i see that u have @ before your name and all of your replays are with questions again imba reply from you with nothing said... my expirience here with admins is fine till now,they are little slow in answering but no1 ask questions they are here to give answers and help us thanks |
20/09/2011 23:00 |
| Mr. Q17 - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@Bisho said: What do you want? Good averages? I think that's generated radomly. Do you want progression? You need a school with more than 4 balls in an excellent category. And you will get players with +60% or +70% . I have an Excellent school in Portugal. It is an 80% school, excellent quality. Got a player today 6 Average with 53% progression. And one from Netherlands School 5 star school (100%) and excellent quality a bit better average at 18 and progression 56%... I don't think "generated randomly" applies to what's happening since everyone got "randomly" crappy players. Edited by Romasik2000 21-09-2011 00:15 |
21/09/2011 00:01 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
366 msgs.
First-team player
|
Completely agree with you. The 50 Million dollars spent investing in Schools shouldn't yield players that are 0 - 15. I continued to invest in the schools because I saw that mediocre schools would produce players in the 20 - 30 range as Juniors (after we promoted them from the school). It appears the only thing that really "changed" is that our School Averages do not jump up to the Normalized averages once promoted to the Junior Team. This is an inherent problem, as we have discussed, because many of us have realized that Schools can be a tremendous long term investment and have invested money based on the notion that we getting players utilizing the same system as before. Now, if this is not some glitch or bug, we have detrimentally relied on last season's School mechanism and invested even more money (that could have gone towards stadiums or purchasing straight out Senior players). Admins, just please give us an answer either way. Please let us know if this is how the schools will be going forward, or if this was just a bug in the transitioning of training, etc... that you are in the process of fixing. Thank you |
21/09/2011 00:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
To answer my own question, looks like new teams start out with pretty crappy players too. No more random 60+ av. player. Looks like averages of new players dropped across the border. | 21/09/2011 00:25 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
366 msgs.
First-team player
|
Some guidance would be helpful that is all. If that's the way it is now, then so be it... the money is already spent on schools and I won't spend another dime on a school. But let us know either way so we can adapt our strategy. |
21/09/2011 00:41 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1835 msgs.
International
|
Nobody heard of the changes. Lovely. Agree with the above. Any sort of coherent answer would be nice. Its maddening having changes sprung on us that cost many players millions. |
21/09/2011 00:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
366 msgs.
First-team player
|
What's going to happen now, is there will be a huge gap between great teams (the ones who already have awesome Juniors from the schools of last season) and then this year's players coming out. It will take us nearly 2 full seasons (and aging of the player 2 years which makes him less valuable) just to catch up to the players who already got great school players last season.... for which we bought the schools and relied upon. | 21/09/2011 00:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
116 msgs.
Substitute
|
Yeppeppers, I just got a new player from my Argentinian clown school and he sucks floppychops. For a living. 19 avg and I paid 10 bananas for a florpcast and it showed a hornizornital lyne so I thourrrght I mayde a mirstake and clircked it agarirn. NYERPPP He has no farpllng progressioneion. What the chuzzwazzzaz? What's the point of getting OLD SKOOL playaz if they're only going to be useless flautists? Edited by fussypaggot 21-09-2011 01:49 |
21/09/2011 01:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
6
