Forum » General » 90 percent scout | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
122 msgs.
Substitute
|
Wondering if someone could reassure me it is worth paying his 300,000 plus salary...so far nothing close to 30 avg. maybe it was wishful thinking | 27/12/2011 02:29 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
700 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
What are you asking him to do? If your searches are unreasonable, no amount of talent is going to help him. | 27/12/2011 02:38 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
122 msgs.
Substitute
|
A forum post I read a few weeks ago suggested that the higher the rating on the scout, the better players he would find (averages). Is this true? | 27/12/2011 02:42 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
163 msgs.
Substitute
|
from my experience: not true just faster search |
27/12/2011 02:45 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
5205 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
It is true, but the biggest difference is > 95% scout | 27/12/2011 02:53 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
5205 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
And to clarify: better players are returned and more of them faster | 27/12/2011 02:53 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
133 msgs.
Substitute
|
Scouts are terrible. An absolute waste of money. | 27/12/2011 03:26 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
142 msgs.
Substitute
|
goaldfndr said: Scouts are terrible. An absolute waste of money. Absolutly agree...and nothing we can do with the player,,most of them are protected.. |
27/12/2011 06:54 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
156 msgs.
Substitute
|
goaldfndr said: Scouts are terrible. An absolute waste of money. +1 |
27/12/2011 08:12 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
76 msgs.
Rookie
|
bunkr said: goaldfndr said: Scouts are terrible. An absolute waste of money. +1 +1 I changed my scout to 1400 salary one for now, coach sec is pretty useful though |
27/12/2011 08:40 |
- Div/Gr | ||