Forum » General » OM for IM | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
609 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
my formation is currently a 3-4-3 with a LIM,RIM, DEF MID and IM do you think it would be better if i sold my IM and got an OM | 11/02/2012 18:21 |
- Div/Gr | ||
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
OM good for scoring and support striker IM good for passing and control of the ball |
11/02/2012 18:39 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
609 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
ok but which one do you think i should have OM or IM | 11/02/2012 18:50 |
- Div/Gr | ||
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
i think OM | 11/02/2012 18:59 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
609 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
ok hopefully i will find a good OM for cheap | 11/02/2012 19:07 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1797 msgs.
International
|
OM can do both pass and score | 11/02/2012 21:45 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
131 msgs.
Substitute
|
Good OMs are rare right? | 12/02/2012 01:24 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
769 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
So which is better for other midfield play LM/RM or LIM/RIM |
12/02/2012 09:24 |
Mustangs - Div2/Gr2 | ||
Username
1797 msgs.
International
|
Both just that OM can attack | 12/02/2012 10:24 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1118 msgs.
International
|
I do prefer IM rather than OM but it also depends on the tactics. IM allows better management of the ball, more posession and higher recovery rates. OM will of course score more but if you get a reasonable CF you'll get same or even better scoring ability. But its just my opinion. | 12/02/2012 21:35 |
- Div/Gr | ||