| Forum » General » Injuries - official statement | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Nah, whether he injures or not , he will still be training ^_^ | 19/02/2012 18:04 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
A dude with acl tear will not be training. Most injuries of any sort will forgo sprint and run... Its too complex to program. I would make injuries trainable at a % of recovery. 90% recovered, 90% training. That would make it easy... Not. |
19/02/2012 18:12 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
600 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@rebsiot said: A dude with acl tear will not be training. Most injuries of any sort will forgo sprint and run... Its too complex to program. I would make injuries trainable at a % of recovery. 90% recovered, 90% training. That would make it easy... Not. thats gonna be kinda harsh on sooooo long injuries! |
19/02/2012 22:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
6832 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
You just know it will end up with bugs all team injured in first match | 19/02/2012 22:46 |
| Steel City - Div4/Gr12 | ||
|
Username
769 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I think for a player to loose his training attributes like obviously starting motivation is a bit harsh as a player getting a long term injury is random and it would only open up complaints and ill feeling that manager feels like he has been picked on and punished is some way as his maybe star player cant play and now cant even improve for weeks thus denoting him as a waste of space and a total waste of money spent. There would have to be a prerequisite set like if a player has a lower fitness level or a lower stamina level then he is at risk of being injured for a long period but this would have to be a pre agreed thing with input from all SM managers so there could be no scope for an unfair treatment feeling by all managers. |
19/02/2012 22:47 |
| Mustangs - Div2/Gr2 | ||
|
Username
600 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
billyo11 said: I think for a player to loose his training attributes like obviously starting motivation is a bit harsh as a player getting a long term injury is random and it would only open up complaints and ill feeling that manager feels like he has been picked on and punished is some way as his maybe star player cant play and now cant even improve for weeks thus denoting him as a waste of space and a total waste of money spent. There would have to be a prerequisite set like if a player has a lower fitness level or a lower stamina level then he is at risk of being injured for a long period but this would have to be a pre agreed thing with input from all SM managers so there could be no scope for an unfair treatment feeling by all managers. +1 |
19/02/2012 22:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Billyo, I don't think this will be as much of a problem as it was on the old simulator (where it was virtually no problem) because much more training is now done on the junior level. Still, it's a good point and I do think it should be affected by fitness. |
19/02/2012 23:05 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
eamwilson said: You just know it will end up with bugs all team injured in first match +1 |
19/02/2012 23:05 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
769 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
The way I would view it is this : Say a player with 99% fitness /99% stamina has say1% chance of piching up a long term injury of 2 weeks A player with 80% fitness / 80% stamina has a 10% chance of picking up a long term injury of 4 weeks A player with 50% fitness/50% stamina has a 50% chance of picking up a long term injury of 8 weeks This is only off the top of my head so its open to much debate and Im sure much comment but the way I see it is if a manager minds his players and keeps them fit and rotates his team then the less chance of a long term injury so a good manager who minds the players need not worry. But would this increase an already inflated market that can not really be reversed not with peolpe already deciding to spend big money on players. But as you work up or down divisions the the price is equalised to that division.What is might do is inprove the value of an older player (good effort's were made in this area last last season) A manager might decide to have an older player of a lower price as a back up player or an older player with a higher average as his starting player and as he wants to sell on the price would not drop that much because there would always be a market for these players and it might make squad selecting more important in the sincee of a younger with older player in preferred positions allowing younger good players available to a wider scope of managers As the sayinf goes.......just my 2 cent worth |
19/02/2012 23:21 |
| Mustangs - Div2/Gr2 | ||
|
Username
769 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
hewhoamareismyself said: Billyo, I don't think this will be as much of a problem as it was on the old simulator Cool my friend.Im fairly new here so I dont know of the past chapters LOL New things make the game interesting but the recent lack of form with CF was a bad bad idea... On weekends things seem to be tried out but then on a Monday its back to normal just as I think I got it sussed.My CF played good on a sat and hit the target then on a sun he just tried for the coner post again so what hope of picking a team for Mon LOLLLLLL  |
19/02/2012 23:39 |
| Mustangs - Div2/Gr2 | ||
3
