| Forum » General » Calling back Loaned player | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I actually think that's a great idea. People won't do it just cos they got a 1 week injury. Maybe 250 or 500 gb. You can do it but it's gonna hit you in the pocket | 05/07/2012 20:28 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
Why shud we pay gb to bring them bak? Its our player and if we feels he is not in the hands of a deserved manager then we shud bring him bak Asap. The expense of 500 or 250 gb's is ridiculous. Only top tier managers can afford tat. I have been in this game for more than one yr and i don have gb's close to even 250. And most countries do not hav d option to buy dem usin real money. If its needed for the utmost den 25 or 50gb's will be a nice option. Pls bear in mind tat rules must be implemented for the benefit of both parties both managers and developers. |
05/07/2012 20:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
1382 msgs.
International
|
winniewlsn said: Why shud we pay gb to bring them bak? Its our player and if we feels he is not in the hands of a deserved manager then we shud bring him bak Asap. The expense of 500 or 250 gb's is ridiculous. Only top tier managers can afford tat. I have been in this game for more than one yr and i don have gb's close to even 250. And most countries do not hav d option to buy dem usin real money. If its needed for the utmost den 25 or 50gb's will be a nice option. Pls bear in mind tat rules must be implemented for the benefit of both parties both managers and developers. When you loan a player it is your responsibility to do the homework. Ask important questions and get feedback from other managers. I like the 250gb option. Mistakes happen and people lie so this would be a way to get a player back from an unqualified manager if it should happen. Let me add, how about rewarding those who buy pack manager to call back 3 loans without penalty? Edited by cmccourt 05-07-2012 21:16 |
05/07/2012 21:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1368 msgs.
International
|
There should be a money option along with the GB option. Maybe the player's salary for the year. | 05/07/2012 23:34 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I like the idea of 250 GB to recall a loan, it's enough that you'd only really do it if you wanted your player back. I also think you should have to pay the manager who was training the player the amount of salary they paid the player, to help prevent just doing it for no reason. It also keeps a player from just freely recalling a player they loaned out that someone worked hard to build up so they can have their well trained player back for a final push the last few weeks. Recalling a player you legitimately worked hard to train that you were planning on using for your final push would kind of suck. But again, the most important part of loans is that you need to build a relationship with the player you're loaning with and not just loan out to anybody. |
06/07/2012 00:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5205 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I think 250 GB is a bare minimum. If the guy who leant me his 86 average RDF were to recall him right before a game that could decide whether I relegate, I would be devastated. The option should appear if the player has not been trained for 7 days in a row, and not if his team is training him. |
06/07/2012 02:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1835 msgs.
International
|
i personally thing that option should just appear for 2 days at half-season mark.. you should not be allowed to recall player just like that.. befor loaning, it is a necessity to do a background check. if one is not doing that, it is his mistake.. also, it is always preferable to form long term loaning partners.. with whom you exchange season after season.. |
06/07/2012 02:40 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
2608 msgs.
Best scorer
|
And when you recall the player the other manager has 48h before the player comes back. You seriously don't want to just log off thinking you set starting line-up well before the game but you come back and see everything is messed up because a player is gone | 06/07/2012 04:04 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
1382 msgs.
International
|
@CelloG said: I think 250 GB is a bare minimum. If the guy who leant me his 86 average RDF were to recall him right before a game that could decide whether I relegate, I would be devastated. The option should appear if the player has not been trained for 7 days in a row, and not if his team is training him. Sounds like a good solution. |
06/07/2012 04:12 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
sanyam said: i personally thing that option should just appear for 2 days at half-season mark.. you should not be allowed to recall player just like that.. yes, the half season mark option is a good one. It 'll prevent managers from recalling their players whenever they want. Like the loan option it 'll not be available after 19 games. So a season long trained loanee will stay wit the training manager for their final games too. But this 250gb expense is a way too high dear bro's. |
06/07/2012 04:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
2
