| Forum » General » Paying stupid amounts of money for juniors... | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
686 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I apologise to you dee for being an ass, and i do agree with your view, and think you make some very good points  |
15/11/2012 11:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
can someone explain to me what the search bug was? Is gb search likely to find more players once it's fixed? pm is fine if you don't want to derail. |
15/11/2012 11:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
608 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
aleph44 said: can someone explain to me what the search bug was? Is gb search likely to find more players once it's fixed? pm is fine if you don't want to derail. Searching 85%+ actually searched 97%+, or something like that. To get 85 prog players, you had to search 70 prog, or something like that. |
15/11/2012 11:59 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
686 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
The bug has been fixed, hense the free GB searches as compensation to managers. The bug was that if you searched for a certain Progression that the system would search for a higher one. For example if i were to have searched for an 80Prog player the results would come up with 85+ prog, so people werent getting many results if they were searching for 85+ or 95+ because it would be going for higher prog players For and example i searched 80+Prog last season and this player came in the search - http://en3.strikermanager.com/jugador.php?id_jugador=8950161 and as you can see it is a 91Prog player |
15/11/2012 12:01 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
thanks both. i'll keep an eye on junior prices for the positions i train. i don't expect this to affect 92 fc+ as much as 85-90 fc. |
15/11/2012 15:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
6832 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
The players I have been paying a lot for have been 94-95 fc I expect them to come down in price a little but these players are still pretty rare | 15/11/2012 16:05 |
| Steel City - Div4/Gr12 | ||
|
Username
3880 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Basically the formula was whatever prog you searched for 100 was added and it was divided by 2 so 85 prog search was 85+100=185 divided by 2 so 85 prog search was looking for 92.5 prog+ which makes q big difference | 15/11/2012 18:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
454 msgs.
First-team player
|
which means the guys called 80 prog were actualy above 90 prog.. damn i shud have bought more of those players holl used to auction  |
15/11/2012 18:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
All the mids I got from Holl are 89+ prog  |
15/11/2012 18:58 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
454 msgs.
First-team player
|
lucky u! i got just one RIM from him who was 90 FC | 15/11/2012 19:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
2
