| Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
|
||
|
51 msgs.
Rookie
|
@Rand said: Users who have abused the game rules should get a penalty. That is my opinion. I agree with the penalty, but i have to say that i have proposed an even severer one, but it was not accepted. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 12:28 I fail to understand how one abuses the rule. There were discussions in this forum before, which had mentioned about the season end mayhem that took place last season. The admin then did not consider it a bug, nor did it feel there was an issue of abusing the rules. Many of us have actually fired players to get hold of newer players. Now when a 50 becomes 40 it is a huge loss considering one may actually have fired a 45 to get hold of the player. Moreover, one has also set the contracts accordingly. So many of us will end up paying astronomical sums for those that actually deserve much less. We all feel that the game should not be decided on who plays the fastest finger first, or who has the maximum bandwidth. So nothing can actually help the situation apart from undoing the events of the last few days. |
20/06/2011 12:46 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
Amsterdam United said: Me the same i sold other players for cheap and fired alot of playrrs to make some room now i am weaker then before with less money that i should have had gr robin Sorry to hear this, but it's the price you have to pay for trying to abuse the system. You were not suposed to get those players for free, so i find it fair if you now have to pay for it. |
20/06/2011 12:47 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
213 msgs.
Substitute
|
Joy73 said: @Rand said: Users who have abused the game rules should get a penalty. That is my opinion. I agree with the penalty, but i have to say that i have proposed an even severer one, but it was not accepted. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 12:28 I fail to understand how one abuses the rule. There were discussions in this forum before, which had mentioned about the season end mayhem that took place last season. The admin then did not consider it a bug, nor did it feel there was an issue of abusing the rules. Many of us have actually fired players to get hold of newer players. Now when a 50 becomes 40 it is a huge loss considering one may actually have fired a 45 to get hold of the player. Moreover, one has also set the contracts accordingly. So many of us will end up paying astronomical sums for those that actually deserve much less. We all feel that the game should not be decided on who plays the fastest finger first, or who has the maximum bandwidth. So nothing can actually help the situation apart from undoing the events of the last few days. Completely agree with you. There should not have been an AV decreasing. Lots of users knew about this option to get players for free, so its still fair enough. And as Joy said - the same happened in the 1st season, you, admins, just didnt consider it a bug. :/ |
20/06/2011 12:50 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
221 msgs.
Substitute
|
@Rand said: Amsterdam United said: Me the same i sold other players for cheap and fired alot of playrrs to make some room now i am weaker then before with less money that i should have had gr robin Sorry to hear this, but it's the price you have to pay for trying to abuse the system. You were not suposed to get those players for free, so i find it fair if you now have to pay for it. Nobody was able of knowing the last 2 days that this was "abusing the rules"... None of us, not-admin-managers, have been given the slightest notice that this was a bug. |
20/06/2011 12:50 |
| Kings XI Punjab - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
21 msgs.
Child's coach
|
so those player we brought, are they continuing to drop their avg? | 20/06/2011 12:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
Joy73 said: @Rand said: Users who have abused the game rules should get a penalty. That is my opinion. I agree with the penalty, but i have to say that i have proposed an even severer one, but it was not accepted. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 12:28 I fail to understand how one abuses the rule. There were discussions in this forum before, which had mentioned about the season end mayhem that took place last season. The admin then did not consider it a bug, nor did it feel there was an issue of abusing the rules. Many of us have actually fired players to get hold of newer players. Now when a 50 becomes 40 it is a huge loss considering one may actually have fired a 45 to get hold of the player. Moreover, one has also set the contracts accordingly. So many of us will end up paying astronomical sums for those that actually deserve much less. We all feel that the game should not be decided on who plays the fastest finger first, or who has the maximum bandwidth. So nothing can actually help the situation apart from undoing the events of the last few days. I said that before, it desobeys rule 2: 2) It is forbidden to take advantage of some fault of the game. If a manager discovers an error or bug in the system, is obliged to inform an administrator or via e-mail to info@strikermanager.com. If a player is set to auction at 10M, you can't obviously get it later for 0€. It has no sense. We said, in our message before the last season ended, that players would be on auction starting on its market value. It's not a matter of who has the fastest fingers, it's a matter of fairness. It's unfair for you to get a team 5 points better than 2 days before, for free. It's obvious. |
20/06/2011 12:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
213 msgs.
Substitute
|
Cultif said: @Rand said: Amsterdam United said: Me the same i sold other players for cheap and fired alot of playrrs to make some room now i am weaker then before with less money that i should have had gr robin Sorry to hear this, but it's the price you have to pay for trying to abuse the system. You were not suposed to get those players for free, so i find it fair if you now have to pay for it. Nobody was able of knowing the last 2 days that this was "abusing the rules"... None of us, not-admin-managers, have been given the slightest notice that this was a bug. Another good thought. Now admin teams will be far superior than regular user teams. Nice going!  |
20/06/2011 12:52 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
213 msgs.
Substitute
|
@Rand said: Joy73 said: @Rand said: Users who have abused the game rules should get a penalty. That is my opinion. I agree with the penalty, but i have to say that i have proposed an even severer one, but it was not accepted. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 12:28 I fail to understand how one abuses the rule. There were discussions in this forum before, which had mentioned about the season end mayhem that took place last season. The admin then did not consider it a bug, nor did it feel there was an issue of abusing the rules. Many of us have actually fired players to get hold of newer players. Now when a 50 becomes 40 it is a huge loss considering one may actually have fired a 45 to get hold of the player. Moreover, one has also set the contracts accordingly. So many of us will end up paying astronomical sums for those that actually deserve much less. We all feel that the game should not be decided on who plays the fastest finger first, or who has the maximum bandwidth. So nothing can actually help the situation apart from undoing the events of the last few days. I said that before, it desobeys rule 2: 2) It is forbidden to take advantage of some fault of the game. If a manager discovers an error or bug in the system, is obliged to inform an administrator or via e-mail to info@strikermanager.com. If a player is set to auction at 10M, you can't obviously get it later for 0€. It has no sense. We said, in our message before the last season ended, that players would be on auction starting on its market value. It's not a matter of who has the fastest fingers, it's a matter of fairness. It's unfair for you to get a team 5 points better than 2 days before, for free. It's obvious. Anyway, as mentioned here before, stamina and morale decrease to 0 would be a way better solution. |
20/06/2011 12:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
54 msgs.
Rookie
|
We basically get screwed because of design errors by the programmers... I sold a couple of 45avg players to be able to buy these players, and now I'm royally screwed with my 42avg team... GG |
20/06/2011 12:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
221 msgs.
Substitute
|
They already did because they have the package-stuff and everything. | 20/06/2011 12:53 |
| Kings XI Punjab - Div1/Gr1 | ||
3
