| Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
|
||
|
Username
27 msgs.
Child's coach
|
Yeah thats true i did signed players but also i bought 1 and he is also being decreased i bought 2,5 mil for him | 20/06/2011 13:07 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
whats wrong with other @ only rand show his face here!!! c´mon show yourselves! RAND you are right in some way but not totally the penalty should be different for players av 70 than players av 50 and you know that what are we suppose to do with a team av 39 in 5 ?¿ no fucking way there are squads at 7 much stronger we should be given the posibility of paying a fine or something different like having our players reste to the proper level on the division given | 20/06/2011 13:08 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
SrInerte said: whats wrong with other @ only rand show his face here!!! c´mon show yourselves! RAND you are right in some way but not totally the penalty should be different for players av 70 than players av 50 and you know that what are we suppose to do with a team av 39 in 5 ?¿ no fucking way there are squads at 7 much stronger we should be given the posibility of paying a fine or something different like having our players reste to the proper level on the division given You would have lost the team in two weeks due to red numbers if we had fined you by the amount we considered correct. So, i guess this solution suits you better. |
20/06/2011 13:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
213 msgs.
Substitute
|
SrInerte said: whats wrong with other @ only rand show his face here!!! c´mon show yourselves! RAND you are right in some way but not totally the penalty should be different for players av 70 than players av 50 and you know that what are we suppose to do with a team av 39 in 5 ?¿ no fucking way there are squads at 7 much stronger we should be given the posibility of paying a fine or something different like having our players reste to the proper level on the division given Cant agree more.  |
20/06/2011 13:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
but the dicrease is not fair players av 50 could haev been decrease aroun 5% or so, or even taken out and leave the squad reset the way we had because we see our team worst than origens | 20/06/2011 13:13 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
221 msgs.
Substitute
|
Their are definitely some better solutions available. * Drop moral and fitness to 0, so inactive managers who didn't get free players have a huge advantage since their players will be better for a couple of weeks + other managers have to pay money to improve fitness and morale. * Drop avg in 10% since this would more represent the avg-gain of that players. * Backup to teams and finance of 3 days ago *... |
20/06/2011 13:14 |
| Kings XI Punjab - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
51 msgs.
Rookie
|
I completely agree with you that to develop a team within minutes completely ruins the game. But the point the admins seem to be skirting is the issue about the first season. No penalty was awarded at that point of time. So we already have a few teams who have already worked against the spirit of the game. If there has to be a punishment it has to be awarded to them in the first place. Second to suggest that we were all breaking the spirit of the game is frivolous. I had a couple of players in the short-list knowing that their managers were not active. So the whole idea of getting free players was already there in many players' minds, and that too without breaking either the rule or spirit of the game. |
20/06/2011 13:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Hello, I'm a @.. and i'm showing myself! | 20/06/2011 13:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
747 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Do you want my opinion? I didn't sign ANY free player, because I knew there was something which was wrong with that. I only signed a free defender by mistake because it appeared in the secretary coach and wanted to test if it was possible to sign senior players for free in that way, and when I saw it was possible I decided to fire him at the moment. As @Rand said, it had no sense that a 71 defender was on auction at 125 millions and was signed FOR FREE after it. That spoils the whole game, and it's obvious that now something must be done. When I saw I was able to sign all those players for free, I decided to sign any of them, because I knew that later that could bring problems to me. All of you should have done the same, I think. Some of you suggest to put the stamina and morale to 0, and with all my respect, it seems a totally self-seeking suggestion. What about later? two weeks later and after paying a miserable amount of money you will have again your 60 average players FOR FREE, when many users have paid millions and millions to get them. That's what is unfair, and not what it's being done now to restore all this chaos. |
20/06/2011 13:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
27 msgs.
Child's coach
|
I still say there shouldnt be a punished the game made a fould its like a supermarket sell s a coca cola for 1 cent you bought it and drinked it now they say a day later u have to pay 1 euro but my bankaccount is out of money then the supermarket should pay up for it its there mistake if i make a mistake doing my tax nobody is gonna give it back to me so i say fould is at the game give players avg back fix the error and the game takes its loss not the players |
20/06/2011 13:16 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
5
