| Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
|
||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 13:16 |
20/06/2011 13:16 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3 msgs.
Ball boy
|
i bought cf 49 for 3.5m..now he just 34...is it fair...it just fucks | 20/06/2011 13:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
Cultif said: Their are definitely some better solutions available. * Drop moral and fitness to 0, so inactive managers who didn't get free players have a huge advantage since their players will be better for a couple of weeks + other managers have to pay money to improve fitness and morale. * Drop avg in 10% since this would more represent the avg-gain of that players. * Backup to teams and finance of 3 days ago *... 1.- useless. In two weeks you would have them at 99 and running. 2.- Could be, but, really, what you did was wrong, and we want you to know that what you did was wrong, so it wont happen again, and the best way to achieve that, is applying a severe penalty. 3.- Impossible for us to do that at the moment. |
20/06/2011 13:19 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
747 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Joy73 said: But the point the admins seem to be skirting is the issue about the first season. No penalty was awarded at that point of time. So we already have a few teams who have already worked against the spirit of the game. You can't compare what happened at the first season with this. At that moment, these players were SOLD, and everybody spent his money. Now players have been signed FOR FREE. The difference is huge, in my opinion. |
20/06/2011 13:19 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
so you see fair that the people who sign players 70 av for free have now a player around 60 still for free and the managers like me who sign players around 50 get the same decrease!! i found the players with secret coach i didnt even know they were set at auction from money.The secret finf players free agent and this happens evey day not with 70 av i know we are not in the same place the decrease should be different from 70 av than 50 that´s it | 20/06/2011 13:19 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
213 msgs.
Substitute
|
Now you are not making this game fair - you are just loosing active players, which will soon lead to ------------------------------> DEAD STRIKERMANAGER!  Edited by Cristiano_Ronaldo_7 20-06-2011 13:22 |
20/06/2011 13:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
thanks to show yourself is the least you can do but teher are more @ and still no counting at all, waht´s your opinion ?¿ i thought that only managers who use scripts would have been fine not us | 20/06/2011 13:22 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1328 msgs.
International
|
Actually, I have raised this as a bug, but admin said my information is invalid, so , how to explain it then? Still, its not a big deal, will the players progression go down? |
20/06/2011 13:23 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
16 msgs.
Cadet
|
So, when a player is out of contract and considered, wait for it a "Free Agent". We then sign him for free, as that happens in football. Signing "Free Agents". Now we get punished with a 20% reduction in their average. How was I (we) to know you borked the game? The situation you describe as "abusing" the rules happens for real in football. A player without a contract is a "Free Agent". |
20/06/2011 13:23 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
116 msgs.
Substitute
|
It happened in the first season, and I wasn't aware of it, and I didn't say a thing. And you didn't consider it a bug. This is absolutely ridiculous. | 20/06/2011 13:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
6
