| Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
|
||
|
Username
772 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@internat said: paus united said: @internat said: We've been discussing here how to solve this, and we can offer to restore players average to a -10%, and 2 years younger. If most of you agree we will proceed this way. Although I think the managers shouldn't get punished for doing nothing wrong, this measure is reasonable to make the game 'fair'. I can agree with it.. Just a mathematical question,is the 10 percent just added? Because otherwise it's just making the truth a bit more beautiful then it is? For example: a player of 60 avg became 48, will it now become 52.8 (48*1.1) or 54 (60*0.9) If you player was 60, and now is 48, at the end he should be 54. So those who used the bug, ignored the warnings (this was discussed in the forums prior to the weekend and was a known bug), can now get 54avg players for free? While those who heeded the warnings and obeyed the game rules don't benefit? Expect the "-10% avg Rule Poll" thread to be created soon  |
21/06/2011 13:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
116 msgs.
Substitute
|
Obviously, you haven't followed the discussion. Players did not "abuse" the bug, they did not know it was a bug, they signed the players with their coach sec. normally. So they weren't cheating, to be punished. And NO, it was not warned, and it was not discussed in the forums, not a single admin said anything about this before. |
21/06/2011 13:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
352 msgs.
First-team player
|
fact remains some managers benefited from the admins bugs and should not necessarily penalize those users but fair is fair... how do the users that never gained anything from the mistake benefit in order to level the fairness between the managers ??? | 21/06/2011 13:46 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
283 msgs.
First-team player
|
Guess there are three group of users here: Case 1> Who take those free players (about 250) Case 2> Who (about 10 of them included few Mod, lol, believe me, i'm optimistic) know there are free players, know the rule, and don't take the players. Case 3> Who don't know there are free players (thousands of them, it's fair, because free players available for all, not just 250 at case 1, these people just slowww) Now who take the disadvantage? Answer: People in case 1! I'm in case 1 but Come on, please let's it alone, i'm ok with 20% deduction, just let's the game continue. Players don't get the training and stamina recover today. Where is the communication? We don't have ANY announcement about the stamina and training problem, it's exactly like few time before. C'mon admin. |
21/06/2011 13:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
677 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Admins are you going to solve a problem by creating another problem? | 21/06/2011 14:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2 msgs.
Ball boy
|
The 10%avg an 2years reduction are NOT a new problem, it's a adaption of the sanction of the first problem. Let's just do the admins their job and I hope this topic can be closed by tomorrow mornining. |
21/06/2011 14:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
283 msgs.
First-team player
|
Aquilani61 said: The 10%avg an 2years reduction are NOT a new problem, it's a adaption of the sanction of the first problem. Let's just do the admins their job and I hope this topic can be closed by tomorrow mornining. I guess he talk about the training and stamina recover problem happen today. Players don't get the training and stamina recover today. And, again, we don't have ANY announcement about the stamina and training problem, it's exactly like few time before. So? |
21/06/2011 14:13 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
772 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
zozo2k3 said: Obviously, you haven't followed the discussion. Players did not "abuse" the bug, they did not know it was a bug, they signed the players with their coach sec. normally. So they weren't cheating, to be punished. And NO, it was not warned, and it was not discussed in the forums, not a single admin said anything about this before. Firstly to correct you on a few obvious things: I didn't say they abused the bug. I didn't say they cheated (I disagreed with the admin who used the term). I agreed that admins should have sent a warning on this. It was discussed: http://uk.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=255785&inicio=20 Trying reading a bit first before flying of the handle, you might learn something. I read the above thread before the weekend, and it was obvious that signing the players as was done at the end of last season for €0 (I wasn't aware of it at the time) was not meant to occur and was a bug. As has been quoted by one of the admins, using a bug to improve your teams was against the rules. A 10% hit on 70avg or 60avg players isn't a 'fair' fix on this. I've discussed already what i thought would be 'fair' fixes. |
21/06/2011 14:13 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
677 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Over 200 managers benefited from this bug, reducing the sanction would have a profound effect on the entire game (leagues, private leagues and striker cup). | 21/06/2011 14:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1772 msgs.
International
|
I am beginning to dislike Iniesta . | 21/06/2011 14:31 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
30
