| Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
|
||
|
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
|
pizzawd said: Still, its not a big deal, will the players progression go down? players progression won't go down |
20/06/2011 13:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
747 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
SrInerte said: .The secret finf players free agent and this happens evey day n Do you think every day the secretary coach finds more than 20 free 50+ players? ... In my opinion, the managers who paid for the players should keep them with the same average, but the 20% average reduction is a good measure for me. Anyway, another problem is the people who has made money selling these free players. In my opinion they should pay an economic amount for taking profit of that too. |
20/06/2011 13:25 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
747 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
zozo2k3 said: It happened in the first season, and I wasn't aware of it, and I didn't say a thing. And you didn't consider it a bug. This is absolutely ridiculous. Have you read what I wrote before? I paste it again for you, cause I think you're totally wrong. You can't compare what happened at the first season with this. At that moment, these players were SOLD, and everybody spent his money. Now players have been signed FOR FREE. The difference is huge, in my opinion. |
20/06/2011 13:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
25 msgs.
Child's coach
|
I got those players through my coach secretary. i thought it was cos the player had no contract and therefore no fee payable to any existing club. did not even realise that it was a glitch or against the rules. now i have players with salaries beyond what i would pay for for their standard (after the -20%). this means my cashflow for the season is over even before it starts. fire them? yea that means paying for double their wages. is admin going to recoup us for that? | 20/06/2011 13:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
zozo2k3 said: It happened in the first season, and I wasn't aware of it, and I didn't say a thing. And you didn't consider it a bug. This is absolutely ridiculous. It's not the same situation as last season. Back then, all players started the auction at 0€, so it was impossible to sign good players for that amount. You couldnt improve all your team for 0€ like it has happened now. Players were sold cheaper, true, but not at 0€, at least not the best ones, that's for sure. |
20/06/2011 13:32 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
yeah you are right i have to fire a cf 33 28 for that ajaja great signing he was 47 28 was that a cheat dont think so as i wouldnt pay 100 for him just sign him ´cause was for free, we paid your mistake but the managers who got theirselve profitable are ok no problem got the money in the pocket and the buyers pay for that | 20/06/2011 13:32 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
21 msgs.
Child's coach
|
i still dislike the way u admin solve this method by deducting 20% avg of the player we buy. why dont u deduct separately through their avg avg 40+ deduct 2 or 3% avg 45+ deduct 5% avg 50+ deduct 10% avg 55+ deduct 15% avg 60+ deduct 20% avg 65+ deduct 25% avg 70+ deduct 30% isnt this much better? |
20/06/2011 13:34 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
this is what i was talking about much more fair everybody happy Edited by SrInerte 20-06-2011 13:35 |
20/06/2011 13:34 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
21 msgs.
Child's coach
|
SrInerte said: this is what i was talking about much more fair everybody happy Edited by SrInerte 20-06-2011 13:35 i just dont know why they deduct all player avg the same. It isnt fair to those who buy avg only 40+ n 45+. Those who buy avg 70+ or 60+, wont they still gain much? |
20/06/2011 13:36 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
29 msgs.
Child's coach
|
What I honestly think is: 1. This shouldn't affect people all that much. If you get a player for free, then even if that player goes to 20 avg it is more than an empty slot. 2. Maybe this rule of not being able to sign free agents should be made very clear. I consider myself an active user, yet I knew nothing of it. I have been signing free agents since I joined. If these players were not supposed to be signed after auction, the mistake would be 2 things; that the bug happened and they could be signed, and that it was not made VERY clear that these players were not to be signed afterwards. As I said I don't believe that this is as big of a deal as people are making it to be, but to say that we are to be punished for signing a player we found using coach secretary search (if people found these players otherwise, then they probably did do it very consciously) doesn't seem very cool. Now a question: I had a player signed for $0 that apparently was from the auctions - he has lost about 30 stamina points (had 99 this morning) and 8 avg points. It seems to me that he will recover a lot of the lost 8 avg points. am I right? |
20/06/2011 13:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
7
