Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll | Date | |
---|---|---|
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
|
||
54 msgs.
Rookie
|
michaelowen said: SrInerte said: they wont be cristiano, problem here is that not everybody is going to pay for this and is not fair.The managers who signed good players like 70 av they will be having still a good player like 60 av, other managers who signed good players and sold them they have the money to keep investing in good players or reforming stadium which is more money to come,This people are not gonna be punish. At list all should be at the same place, how ?¿ all the players signed free should been decrease to 40 av no matter if they were 50 or 70 and all the managers who´s sold this players have to give the money taken back to the others who signe CUALITY players an see how their player decrease At least i hope they can adjust the deduction avg rate or else i really think of quitting =( ² |
20/06/2011 16:19 |
- Div/Gr | ||
54 msgs.
Rookie
|
Cultif said: How is it possible that not a single admin took the time to send a system message to tell managers that this is against the rules and violators would be punished? My thoughts exactly... |
20/06/2011 16:19 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@Rand said: We're doing this for the sake of the fairness of the game. Nothing more. You're not being fair. There is tons of inactive players. In my group last season, we had 5 active, I'm pretty sure if you look at groups you will find maybe 5-6 active players. So if they lose their players because they don't log on it's their loss, active players should not be punished, that's just creating bad reputation for the game. @Rand, if you guys will keep the punishment, I'm requesting to be moved from my league group back to Div 5. |
20/06/2011 16:24 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Cristiano_Ronaldo_7 said: You are just a stupid motherfucker! I messed up, it was said 10 days in the beginning, now its 1 week. So shut your mouth, retard. This kind of language is completely uncalled for on the forum. Please do not comment unless you can do so in a dignified manner. |
20/06/2011 16:25 |
- Div/Gr | ||
64 msgs.
Rookie
|
When i saw so many players down, i pretty much lost my mind. Thanks to this reduction in avg., i lost todays match also. What more i purchased a player from market chat room, playing 2.M, he is down by 6 points. Now how was i supposed to know that he got it on a free transfer and this is going to happen. Dont let me get started on my CF, paid 9M on the Market for him, after i check his forecast by paying 10GB, it turned out to be less than 50. Now why wud you put player in market for 9M when he is not even going to reach 70 or 80 ? Hopefully admins have some answer to this. I am getting sick of Monopoly of game owners, who change rules whenever they want. and than say it was a bug. If this isnt changed back to Earlier, forsure i am leaving the game. |
20/06/2011 16:31 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
45 msgs.
Child's coach
|
At least, there should be a possibility to stop the auctions before the sudden decrease... Now I'm selling a good player for peanuts! This will also affect the fairness of the game |
20/06/2011 16:32 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
Romasik2000 said: @Rand said: Romasik2000 said: Also... Admins, remember that this game is not for you but for the players (I'm a paying customer) and at the moment big majority of them don't agree with your decision.... think about it. Edited by Romasik2000 20-06-2011 15:56 100% agree. Thanks. The problem for you, is that you are the minority. We won't allow a few of you, actually, it's only 287 users who got a player for free, to make the game unfair for the rest, who is a vast majority. ( There are 18.000 teams ). We're doing this for the sake of the fairness of the game. Nothing more. 18000 teams - yes.... But how many active players? Still quite a lot more than 287. That's for sure. |
20/06/2011 16:33 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@Rand, You said: Last weekend some players, who finished last season contract, have been signed for 0€ because a bug in the game. This is what I don't understand... They were signed as free agents, so where is the "bug"? Are you not allowed to sign free agents in this game, if that's the case what's the point of "No Team" search option in scout and coach secretary? And what's the point of shortlist then? The way I looked at it, is I gave chance to players who wanted to sign a player off the market, I let them do it, and if noone wanted him I signed him as a free agent. Edited by Romasik2000 20-06-2011 16:41 |
20/06/2011 16:35 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
16 msgs.
Cadet
|
@ Admin - Any better solution ?? Any thoughts on reducing the % of reduction in avg ? |
20/06/2011 16:36 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
16 msgs.
Cadet
|
Romasik2000 said: @Rand, You said: Last weekend some players, who finished last season contract, have been signed for 0€ because a bug in the game. This is what I don't understand... They were signed as free agents, so where is the "bug"? Are you not allowed to sign free agents in this game, if that's the case what's the point of "No Team" search option in scout and coach secretary? And what's the point of shortlist then? Edited by Romasik2000 20-06-2011 16:35 "if that's the case what's the point of "No Team" search option in scout and coach secretary" Very good point... |
20/06/2011 16:37 |
- Div/Gr | ||