Go to page 1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 38
  Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll Date
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
Yes
No
Username
227 msgs.
Substitute
sorry to disagree.
But before closing the season and announced it was clear that players were free were to be put on auction with a starting price according to their rating.
It is fucked up now you lower the valuation of those players ..... but it is very clear that you take advantage of a bug in the game. Sorry
20/06/2011 15:42
  ☢ Salvaterra - Div3/Gr5
Username
3 msgs.
Ball boy



Edited by zonius 20-06-2011 16:49
20/06/2011 15:42
  - Div/Gr
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
Also...
Admins, remember that this game is not for you but for the players (I'm a paying customer) and at the moment big majority of them don't agree with your decision.... think about it.
At the moment, chances of me buying any golden balls are slim to none. I'm sorry I'm not gonna invest my money in to something that will "punish" me like I'm some kind of a child who misbehaved in school for something that Admins think was a bug (of their own doing).

Edited by Romasik2000 20-06-2011 16:03
20/06/2011 15:46
  - Div/Gr
Username
227 msgs.
Substitute
Cristiano_Ronaldo_7 said:
Stupid and pathetic decision.


my question: when are possible signing by hostile clause?

Cristiano_Ro...
User
Monday, June 27th i guess.

my question: are u sure? i read in forum says 22


Cristiano_Ronaldo_7 said:
Season started on the 17th, so its 10 days. I havent read the updates yet.



Cristiano Ronaldo.
I think you also like to take advantage over others.
20/06/2011 15:52
  ☢ Salvaterra - Div3/Gr5
Username
16 msgs.
Cadet
Am new (just a week) to the game and it was my End of season sale, I was thinking them as a free agents and bought them firing some mediocre players.

Now I see the players who were bought look worse than the ones I fired . Its injustice.

Though am not entirely in favor of reduction %, I feel a proportionate % of reduction is a better solution.
Most (think 95%) players were between 45-65 avg. so reduce

20% for 65 Avg
19% for 64 Avg
18% for 63 Avg
and so on
.
.
.
.
1% for 46 Avg
0% for 45 Avg

Reducing a flat 20% for every player is not the right way and so easy frustrate the managers and force them to quit.

The managers who bought ordinary players are the one who suffer a lot because of the flat 20% reduction.

NOTE: Admin buying those players were entirely not the managers fault (Most of them thought them as Free agents), its your mistake too to an extend I request you to kindly revise your penalty.

Edited by Acy 20-06-2011 15:56
20/06/2011 15:54
  - Div/Gr
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
Romasik2000 said:
Also...
Admins, remember that this game is not for you but for the players (I'm a paying customer) and at the moment big majority of them don't agree with your decision.... think about it.

Edited by Romasik2000 20-06-2011 15:56



100% agree. Thanks. The problem for you, is that you are the minority.

We won't allow a few of you, actually, it's only 287 users who got a player for free, to make the game unfair for the rest, who is a vast majority. ( There are 18.000 teams ).

We're doing this for the sake of the fairness of the game. Nothing more.



20/06/2011 16:04
  - Div/Gr
Username
213 msgs.
Substitute
ofillodolobato? said:
Cristiano_Ronaldo_7 said:
Stupid and pathetic decision.


my question: when are possible signing by hostile clause?

Cristiano_Ro...
User
Monday, June 27th i guess.

my question: are u sure? i read in forum says 22


Cristiano_Ronaldo_7 said:
Season started on the 17th, so its 10 days. I havent read the updates yet.



Cristiano Ronaldo.
I think you also like to take advantage over others.


72 hours make you reflect on what you've written.

Edited by @puskascrack 20-06-2011 16:28
20/06/2011 16:08
  - Div/Gr
Username
21 msgs.
Child's coach
@Rand said:
Romasik2000 said:
Also...
Admins, remember that this game is not for you but for the players (I'm a paying customer) and at the moment big majority of them don't agree with your decision.... think about it.

Edited by Romasik2000 20-06-2011 15:56



100% agree. Thanks. The problem for you, is that you are the minority.

We won't allow a few of you, actually, it's only 287 users who got a player for free, to make the game unfair for the rest, who is a vast majority. ( There are 18.000 teams ).

We're doing this for the sake of the fairness of the game. Nothing more.




so are u guys going to give a proper deduction due to the different avg player or u admins are fixed to giving the 20% deduction to all avg player?
20/06/2011 16:10
  - Div/Gr
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
@Rand said:
Romasik2000 said:
Also...
Admins, remember that this game is not for you but for the players (I'm a paying customer) and at the moment big majority of them don't agree with your decision.... think about it.

Edited by Romasik2000 20-06-2011 15:56



100% agree. Thanks. The problem for you, is that you are the minority.

We won't allow a few of you, actually, it's only 287 users who got a player for free, to make the game unfair for the rest, who is a vast majority. ( There are 18.000 teams ).

We're doing this for the sake of the fairness of the game. Nothing more.





18000 teams - yes....
But how many active players?
20/06/2011 16:13
  - Div/Gr
Username
221 msgs.
Substitute
How is it possible that not a single admin took the time to send a system message to tell managers that this is against the rules and violators would be punished?
20/06/2011 16:13
  Kings XI Punjab - Div1/Gr1
     
Go to page 1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 38
10